WTF Pictures and WTF videos by Picture Is Unrelated  

 

« Previous | Next »


Aww, Baby ManBearPig Is…Adorable?

WTF-Pics-Awww,BabyManBearPigIs...Adorable?
Submitted By: Anonymous

Fave Comment: “It’s hideous looking! That thing should be kept out of public view. I mean, seriously, who would even think to buy such an ugly shirt?” – dono1

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» See all 138 comments

  1. Josh says:

    Kill it with fire!

  2. gedusngdasn says:

    first!

  3. Someone says:

    Sometimes nature can be extremely cruel…
    Not that funny

  4. SamiVonPants says:

    Where’s PETA when you actually need them, huh?

  5. The What Now? says:

    Gaaaaahhhhhh!!!

  6. TehShay says:

    what the hell?

    • Someone says:

      a severe craniofacial defect, several vertical parts of the cranium have not merged, thats why the eyes are located in the middle of the face, not on the sides as they are actually supposed to. As the piglet has no upper respiratory tract that may be functional, its not going to be able to suck or drink – or to live.

  7. pokey says:

    what… the… fuck…

  8. Tracey says:

    Seriously, what is that thing?? Does anyone know?

    • TheDeathBunnie says:

      That would be a piglet with moderate severe holoprosencephaly…aka, “Cyclops Syndrome.” The textbook cases have only one eye – this one appeared to get almost two, but didn’t quite make it all the way.

  9. jomarthegreat says:

    a face only a mother could love… and I use that term very loosely…

  10. David Perry says:

    Hmmm, usually, they only have one eye… that makes this a rare specimen.

  11. Glicks says:

    ARRRGH BURN IT BURN IT BURN IT BURN IT!

  12. Michelle says:

    Scared the pajeebers outta me!

  13. HoneyBeeee says:

    This is the truest WTF I have ever seen.

  14. Kate in Italy says:

    I’ve been a follower of this site for a few months now and after checking it every day with my afternoon tea this is the first time I’ve actually, verbally, said ‘What The Fuck…’. Out loud. For my husband and houseplants to hear. My husband, too, uttered the magic WTF combo.

  15. Bill says:

    I’m getting one!

  16. Anonymous says:

    KILL IT WITH FIRE.

  17. ubuntu bob says:

    I’ll admit, lately the entries have been all too explicable. But today I spent a solid 45 seconds having the following thought chain: GAAAHHH! WTF! WTF!?! NO WAY!! WTF! maybe… NO! AAUUUUGH! WTFWTFWTFWTFWTF!?!?!?!?

    Day-um.

  18. Decca says:

    What in the hell…? I presume something mutated in utero?

  19. Jo says:

    Poor little thing! :(

  20. The Dude says:

    It’s a birth defect called holoprosencephaly. Human examples of this WTF can be found with an image search for “holoprosencephaly” … if you dare.

  21. Jenni says:

    Can someone please give some kind of context to this thing? WTF is that!?!?

  22. pjoekie says:

    this is what happens when u mate with another breed

  23. gloworm says:

    It’s a pig. It probably died hours or minutes after this photo was taken.

  24. Oscar says:

    I want it for my sideshow!

  25. dono1 says:

    It’s hideous looking! That thing should be kept out of public view. I mean, seriously, who would even think to buy such an ugly shirt?

  26. Pudders says:

    Here’s another image of the poor little blighter. Very rare disorder…. the piglet probably died very soon after this photo was taken. :-(

    http://xenophilius.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/pig-born-with-the-face-of-a-monkey_0.jpg

    • cattleburg says:

      Actually, according to said article, the piglet lived. Their son loved it and fed it and the parents (despite initial horror) decided to raise it. It doesn’t say exactly if it is still alive or not, but other clues point to it living for a while.

  27. Randall says:

    HMMM tasty!!!

  28. Buster3535 says:

    looks similar to that man/bulldog from invasion of the body snatchers (1978)

  29. Ooops! says:

    El culpable huye !! Aqui! Ahora! vaminos mis muchos, el delincuente es de azul y se fue de esta manera. Reunir a los pilotos!

  30. Kitty says:

    if you look up “Holoprosencephaly” on Wikipedia, it gives you the definition and all that without the grusome pictures of *once* living specimens. It does, however, show a photograph of a brain specimen (which is not that bad).

  31. Orlando says:

    that thing needs to be placed in the microwave on high for about 4 hours!!!

  32. Das Beck says:

    Even more WTF, I DID google “holopolololol” whatever and clicked “images” – third row down, fourth picture over was TOM CRUISE (back b/4 he jumped on the crazy train) Now I knew he suffered from a crainal-rectal inversion (Head up Ass Syndrome) but this is new….

  33. Human Zoologist says:

    And here we see the next child of Levi Johnston.

  34. Jo says:

    This piglet is extremely deformed, and most definitely died. There’s no way it could’ve survived, and while I love this site, this is just a little too cruel for me.

    ~Jo

  35. Bob says:

    “This piglet is extremely deformed, and most definitely died. There’s no way it could’ve survived, and while I love this site, this is just a little too cruel for me.”

    Too cruel? It’s a pig! We raise them to slaughter and eat them. Laughing at a deformed one is not being mean to the pig. What if it was an insect with deformed wings? Or a flower with a deformed petal? Would laughing at those things be too cruel also? If this was a human, somebody’s kid, posting that would be a very uncool thing to do. But this is a fucking pig!

    • Jean says:

      Yes, it would. There is a difference between eating because you need to and animal cruelty. Look for those.

      • Anna Rexia says:

        How is it animal cruelty? It was born like that. Are they supposed to be pretty for you to eat them?

        • Kwazzi says:

          Well of course! At least then if you electrocuted it, slit its throat with a knife and then dismembered its bloody corpse, seared it on the barbecue and consumed it with great squelchy nom nom noises it would’ve at LEAST lived for a short while with the happy knowledge that it was pretty.

      • RoanRider says:

        Sorry, but no one “needs to” eat meat.

        • Chimaeroid says:

          Nobody “needs” to eat at all. Only if you want to survive. I don’t understand the supposed moral high ground vegans and vegetarians think they have. Plants die just as much as animals. Of the 5 kingdoms of living things, Eliminating one from your diet, simply because you can empathize with it, it the height of hypocrisy. Just because you can’t hear broccoli scream when you kill it and consume it, doesn’t mean you are more humane.
          Last I checked, humans can’t live off of just water and air and sunlight, (in fact, even plants use nutrients in the soil from decomposing and dead things) Humans are consumers, and more than that, almost true omnivores. We have populated many places on this planet due to us having a diverse diet. If you live in an area where meat is not readily available, your diet is that of plants and fungi primarily, anywhere where animals are readily available, people have become hunters. The differing sources of certain nutrients, and the differing diets for areas around the world show that many diets in certain places are ultimately unhealthy, as they lack certain things we need. People who live primarily off of whale blubber in alaska and the yukon, for example, have certain things missing from their diet.
          There is no evidence that a solely vegan or vegetarian diet is any better than a standard one, because it isn’t true. Most people who happen to be vegetarian are so because meat is expensive and they can’t afford it. It is a luxury, even if the developed world doesn’t see it as one. Those who decide to become vegetarian in the U.S.A, more often do it for ideological reasons that have nothing to do with nutrition at all. In fact, I have seen just as many vegetarians be extremely unhealthy because most people don’t have a real grasp on nutritional needs. I’d like to see a vegetarian live without vitamins, and only off of natural foods, and d less money. Doesn’t happen.
          Strangely enough, there is one thing people can live off of with no other element in their diet. Coconut milk. Not the stuff you buy in the store, that is mostly crushed coconut flesh. I mean the real stuff inside a coconut. In fact, it is soooo well balanced for the human body that we could use it as a plasma replacement if we needed to. While it is tasty though, I would much rather have something more than just coconuts to live off of. Diversity is good.

          Sorry for the tangent.

      • Bob says:

        What are you talking about? Nobody’s beating the pig. We are just poking fun at a picture of it. Nobody here did ANYTHING wrong to the pig. There is no cruelty. It was born that way. Where is the cruelty???

    • Daniel says:

      That reply fails completely in response to people who already think that eating pigs and comparable animals is inappropriate.

      • Bob says:

        Huh? That was not the issue.

        • Daniel says:

          Unless you knew that Jo (the person whom you were quoting) ate pigs (and it turns out that she does not), you cannot even begin argue that she’s wrong on the basis that pigs are eaten.

          Pigs, in fact, are comparable in intelligence to dogs. In some parts of the world, dogs are eaten, and the typical reäction to someone who pitied a deformed dog would be “C’mon, it’s just a dog!” But that would be an inadequate argument in response to someone who didn’t eat dogs, no matter from what culture he or she came.

          • Bob says:

            She implied that it was cruel because of the deformities. I say that it’s not cruel because it’s simply a natural oddity that has nothing to do with cruelty.

            • Bob says:

              And if I saw a picture of a dog who was born with a birth defect, I would not think it was cruel. Nobody purposely made the dog like that. I am baffled by your “logic.”

              • Daniel says:

                Again, the definition of cruel does not intrinsically involve deliberate action; anything distressing or severe can be said to be cruel. (Look in the friggin’ dictionary before you yammer.)

                And, also again, if deliberateness were key, so that the accidental deformity of a dog could not be cruel, then your talk of slaughter for food would have been irrelevant.

                I don’t think that anyone’s logic baffles you so much as you just don’t like it when you run into it.

            • Daniel says:

              What is your first language? In English, “cruel” can mean causing or marked by great pain or distress, unrelentingly severe. Deliberation is not intrinsic to its meaning.

              Further, if an ignorant presumption that willfulness was intrinsic to cruelty had been the key to your original claim, then any talk of the slaughter of pigs for food would simply have been irrelevant.

              You’re making your argument up as you go along.

    • Jo says:

      Look, I’m not trying to be Sargent Buzzkill here.
      I don’t eat pork, personally, and I work with animals. When I see stuff like this, it makes me cringe. Humans are nothing but really screwed up animals that have too much power, and pigs are actually up there in intelligence and awareness with dogs and chimpanzees.
      I found it disturbing and rather sad to see. It’s my opinion; you don’t share it. No big deal.

  36. Simora says:

    Looks like cyclopia a rare disease for both humans and animals where the baby is born with one eye. google images show more examples

  37. S. says:

    The only thing cruel about this is that the swineherder paused to take photos before putting the poor thing out of its misery.

  38. Amber says:

    Why am i the only one who thinks it’s adorable?

    • Snake Oil Baron says:

      No, I kind of think it is cute in a run-away-and-hide-when-you-first-see-it kind of way. Too bad it wouldn’t live. I am torn as too whether I would knowingly eat the bacon if it had been an adult. I would be worried about catching teh oogly. But maybe that ship has already sailed.

  39. Mr Evilwrench says:

    It won’t live long, but I bet it would be tender and juicy, like pig veal, mmm…

  40. PotatoNinja says:

    If it could live instead of dying because of the upper respitory tract thing, i would want one, it’s really cuteXD

  41. TL10 says:

    Ladies and gentlemen, this is an example why nobody should play God…

    • Chimaeroid says:

      Yeah. If you think the game of life is complex, just imagine all the rules the God game would have. Not much fun in that.

  42. Lolz says:

    This is what happens when The Three Little Pigs get it on.

  43. whiteravenred says:

    I told em not to let those rednecks ’round them pigs when they was in heat… damn thing looks just like ole billy bo bob numbnuts.. he’s my brother’s sister’s daddy on my son’s side..
    looks like inbred jed’s sister was mad at him that night.

  44. DaDewd says:

    Sometimes the Spore Creature Creator goes too far.

  45. dono1 says:

    Dead or alive, it’d be great to bring along Trick or Treating. Or dress it in baby clothes and take it to Olin Mills.

  46. Meepo says:

    Wow, DAMN NATURE YOU SCARY!

  47. Vaschon says:

    Is it bad that I’m turned on right now?

  48. Tchom says:

    … it’s still cuter than the girl I took to my school formal

  49. Esahc says:

    This made me cry.

  50. spacclie says:

    How can that man touch it?!?!?!?!

  51. Venus says:

    The love child of Diddy Kong and the little pig who built his house out of sticks.

  52. hoe_lee_SHIT says:

    OMG this is what Al Gore has been warning us about since ealier this decade. ManBearPig. And it’s REPRODUCED.

    but in all seriousness, if that poor thing is real… i feel sorry for it.

    :’(

  53. justinhalochamp says:

    There goes my appetite and the little belief in god I had.

  54. Lindsay says:

    i think its sick that that PIG took a picture of that poor creature, i hope it died quickly and painlessly… nature can be cruel

  55. Stefano says:

    what has been seen cannot be unseen.

  56. A Noun says:

    Oh good grief. This is life, this happens. Also, given the glaze over the poor critter’s eyes, it was already dead when the photos were taken. Now all take a nice deep breath, go look at some fluffy normal kittens and go on with your day.

    • TheDeathBunnie says:

      It could still be alive. A lot of the critters born with this genetic defect are blind as the eyes never really did their thing correctly. And the handler is holding it rather gently for it to be a dead animal. Nevertheless, it’s definitely dead by now so…meh.

      All these people having strokes over documenting a case of a rare genetic condition need to grow up, though. It’s not like he doing anything to be pig – hell, they even tried to feed it, it looks like. Since when is taking a photo considered ‘cruel’? 9_9

  57. Tuxic says:

    OMG this thing is alive and fed milk by son of it’s owners. It’s truly scary…

  58. catcavallaro says:

    I was saying “Oh my god!” my husband looked over and said, “That looks like Papa Smurf.” Dammitt,,,why didn’t I see that?!

  59. Headtail says:

    Apparently, it is still alive. Warning – lots of weird misinformation about cross breeding animals and more creepy pics:

    http://xenophilius.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/piglet-with-monkeys-face/

  60. BoneFish says:

    looks like a monkey fucked a pig

  61. Allison says:

    This was definatley photoshopped.

  62. sigh says:

    I was waiting for the ‘shopped comment.

  63. Go2helll says:

    Ok, This is one of those time where we blame some sick freek who acually did dna muations an this poor thing. We as the upper species should look around at what we got and say thats enough.

    • TheDeathBunnie says:

      Scientists barely understand how this happens naturally – let alone have mastered the ability to reproduce this extremely rare NATURAL genetic anomaly that’s been documented as happening for the past couple thousand years. Learn about what you’re looking at before making such comments.

  64. bellefemmeici says:

    This just makes me sad.

  65. Shay says:

    This isn’t ‘DNA mutations’, this is a birth defect. It is rare but occurs in mammals when certain genes fail to turn on during development. It is not from any type of experimentation. We are not the ‘upper species’; there is no evolutionary ladder placing us at the top. It is a gigantic tree with all species reaching back to the same trunk.

  66. TheBladeRoden says:

    As cruel as humans can be, nature always finds a way to outdo us.

  67. Vinowkron says:

    Where’s you’re god now!!!

  68. matt says:

    maybe this is the pigman kramer was talking about

  69. DJboomshanka says:

    Sloth and Babe finally conceived!

  70. Chamelon says:

    And we all thought Amy Winehouse would never have a baby!

  71. Pam says:

    Awwwwwwwwwwwwww! Sooooooooooo cute!!!- Pam

  72. CrazyWayToFly says:

    It’s not photoshopped, the people who have said holoprosencephaly are correct. Not sure if it’s alobar or semilobar but it’s certainly incompatible with life. It happens when the forebrain of the embryo fails to divide properly.
    Those people who think it’s cruel might be comforted to know that any animal born with such a severe neural defect is essentially a vegetable… it would not have been capable of feeling pain, although it was probably conscious.

  73. kukuruzkin says:

    Ron Pearlman’s kid?

  74. Satan says:

    Don’t worry, human mutations are just as hideous! I saw a big book of black n white photos of aborted children and miscarriages when i was about eight, may have messed me up a little.
    Oh, it was my mothers’, nothing weird- she’s a midwife.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s